State of Conservation
12
Reports
12
Properties concerned
10
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date Start:
2008close
Date end:2008close
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
dong phayayen-khao yai forest complexDong Phayayen-Khao Yai Forest Complex | thailand Thailand | 2008 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Forest fragmentationNeed for ecological corridors. |
No |
golden mountains of altaiGolden Mountains of Altai | russian federation Russian Federation | 2008 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
iguacu national parkIguaçu National Park | brazil Brazil | 2008 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
kaziranga national parkKaziranga National Park | india India | 2008 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Insufficient infrastructure |
No |
niokolo-koba national parkNiokolo-Koba National Park | senegal Senegal | 2008 | Ground transport infrastructure, | Yes |
okapi wildlife reserveOkapi Wildlife Reserve | democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo | 2008 | Ground transport infrastructure, | Yes |
sangay national parkSangay National Park | ecuador Ecuador | 2008 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
simien national parkSimien National Park | ethiopia Ethiopia | 2008 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Declining populations of Walia ibex, Ethiopian wolf and other large mammal species |
Yes |
tropical rainforest heritage of sumatraTropical Rainforest Heritage of Sumatra | indonesia Indonesia | 2008 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
volcanoes of kamchatkaVolcanoes of Kamchatka | russian federation Russian Federation | 2008 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
western caucasusWestern Caucasus | russian federation Russian Federation | 2008 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
yellowstone national parkYellowstone National Park | united states of america United States of America | 2008 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.