State of Conservation
11
Reports
11
Properties concerned
12
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date Start:
2004close
Date end:2004close
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
banc d'arguin national parkBanc d'Arguin National Park | mauritania Mauritania | 2004 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
chitwan national parkChitwan National Park | nepal Nepal | 2004 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
iguacu national parkIguaçu National Park | brazil Brazil | 2004 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
lorentz national parkLorentz National Park | indonesia Indonesia | 2004 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: a) Security limitations on staff and public access to parts of the Park; b) Fire |
No |
phong nha-ke bang national parkPhong Nha-Ke Bang National Park | viet nam Viet Nam | 2004 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
sangay national parkSangay National Park | ecuador Ecuador | 2004 | Ground transport infrastructure, | Yes |
sian ka'anSian Ka'an | mexico Mexico | 2004 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
talamanca range-la amistad reserves / la amistad national parkTalamanca Range-La Amistad Reserves / La Amistad National Park | costa rica,panama Costa Rica Panama |
2004 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
volcanoes of kamchatkaVolcanoes of Kamchatka | russian federation Russian Federation | 2004 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
wood buffalo national parkWood Buffalo National Park | canada Canada | 2004 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
yellowstone national parkYellowstone National Park | united states of america United States of America | 2004 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Brucella infection threat to bison population |
No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.