State of Conservation
242
Reports
41
Properties concerned
48
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date end:2014close
States Parties: | Albania Austria Bosnia and Herzegovina Belgium Bulgaria Switzerland Czechia Germany Spain France Croatia Italy North Macedonia Poland Romania Slovenia Slovakia Ukraine |
Year: | 2014 |
Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Albania Austria Bosnia and Herzegovina Belgium Bulgaria Switzerland Czechia Germany Spain France Croatia Italy North Macedonia Poland Romania Slovenia Slovakia Ukraine |
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Mauritania |
Year: | 2014 |
Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Mauritania |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Mauritania |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Mauritania |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Mauritania |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2014 |
Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17,WHC-02/CONF.202/2 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Cameroon |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Cameroon |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Cameroon |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.203/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Spain |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Decline of the Iberian lynx and Imperial eagle populations |
States Parties: | Spain |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Decline of the Iberian lynx and Imperial eagle populations |
States Parties: | Thailand |
Year: | 2014 |
Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Forest fragmentation / Need for ecological corridors |
States Parties: | Thailand |
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Forest fragmentation / Need for ecological corridors |
States Parties: | Thailand |
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Forest fragmentationNeed for ecological corridors |
States Parties
Albania Australia Austria Belgium Bosnia and Herzegovina Brazil Bulgaria Cameroon Canada Central African Republic Colombia Congo Costa Rica Côte d'Ivoire Croatia Czechia Democratic Republic of the Congo Dominica Ecuador Ethiopia France Germany Guinea Honduras India Indonesia Italy Mauritania Mexico Nepal North Macedonia Panama Peru Poland Romania Russian Federation Senegal Slovakia Slovenia South Africa Spain Switzerland Thailand Ukraine United Republic of Tanzania United States of America Viet Nam Yemen
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.