State of Conservation
255
Reports
42
Properties concerned
49
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date end:2015close
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Forest fragmentation / Need for ecological corridors |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Forest fragmentationNeed for ecological corridors |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Forest fragmentationNeed for ecological corridors |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Forest fragmentationNeed for ecological corridors |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Forest fragmentationNeed for ecological corridors. |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Forest fragmentationNeed for ecological corridors |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1991 |
Document Source: | SC-91/CONF.002/15 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.203/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.203/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Need for more effective catchment management in lands adjacent to the Park |
States Parties
Albania Australia Austria Belgium Bosnia and Herzegovina Brazil Bulgaria Cameroon Canada Central African Republic China Colombia Congo Costa Rica Côte d'Ivoire Croatia Czechia Democratic Republic of the Congo Dominica Ecuador Ethiopia France Germany Guinea Honduras India Indonesia Italy Mauritania Mexico Nepal North Macedonia Panama Peru Poland Romania Russian Federation Senegal Slovakia Slovenia South Africa Spain Switzerland Thailand Ukraine United Republic of Tanzania United States of America Viet Nam Yemen
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.