State of Conservation
8
Reports
8
Properties concerned
9
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2015close
Date end:2015close
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
aksumAksum | ethiopia Ethiopia | 2015 | Interpretative and visitation facilities,
Other Threats: Structural instability of Stele 3 |
No |
archaeological site of cyreneArchaeological Site of Cyrene | libya Libya | 2015 | Interpretative and visitation facilities, | No |
cultural landscape of honghe hani rice terracesCultural Landscape of Honghe Hani Rice Terraces | china China | 2015 | Interpretative and visitation facilities, | No |
historic centre of limaHistoric Centre of Lima | peru Peru | 2015 | Interpretative and visitation facilities, | No |
liverpool – maritime mercantile cityLiverpool – Maritime Mercantile City | united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland | 2015 | Interpretative and visitation facilities, | Yes |
maloti-drakensberg parkMaloti-Drakensberg Park | lesotho,south africa Lesotho South Africa |
2015 | Interpretative and visitation facilities,
Other Threats: Need for further research and documentation to establish an inventory of rock art in Sehlabathebe National Park; Need for study of the potential cultural contribution of other landscape elements to the cultural values of Sehlabathebe National Park |
No |
van nellefabriekVan Nellefabriek | netherlands (kingdom of the) Netherlands (Kingdom of the) | 2015 | Interpretative and visitation facilities, | No |
vat phou and associated ancient settlements within the champasak cultural landscapeVat Phou and Associated Ancient Settlements within the Champasak Cultural Landscape | lao people's democratic republic Lao People's Democratic Republic | 2015 | Interpretative and visitation facilities, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.