State of Conservation
8
Reports
8
Properties concerned
8
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date Start:
2010close
Date end:2010close
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
ancient city of nessebarAncient City of Nessebar | bulgaria |
2010 | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure, | No |
cultural landscape of sintraCultural Landscape of Sintra | portugal |
2010 | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure,
Other Threats: b) Lack of conservation of parks and palaces |
No |
fortifications on the caribbean side of panama: portobelo-san lorenzoFortifications on the Caribbean Side of Panama: Portobelo-San Lorenzo | panama |
2010 | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure,
Other Threats: a) Deterioration and destruction of the fabric of the property by environmental factors, lack of a maintenance programme, as well as polluted water |
No |
historic centre of bruggeHistoric Centre of Brugge | belgium |
2010 | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure, | No |
historic centre of bukharaHistoric Centre of Bukhara | uzbekistan |
2010 | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure, | No |
kizhi pogostKizhi Pogost | russian federation |
2010 | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure,
Other Threats: a) Structural integrity of the Church of the Transfiguration |
No |
old bridge area of the old city of mostarOld Bridge Area of the Old City of Mostar | bosnia and herzegovina |
2010 | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure,
Other Threats: b) Cracks appearing on the surface of the old bridge. |
No |
tyreTyre | lebanon |
2010 | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure,
Other Threats: Insufficient maintenance |
No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.