Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

309
Reports
105
Properties concerned
68
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date end:2015close
Threats* : Commercial developmentclose Interpretative and visitation facilitiesclose Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructureclose Industrial areasclose
States Parties: Greece
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: India
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Commercial development
Other Threats: Worrying state of conservation of Agra Fort
States Parties: India
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B.Corr
Threats*: Commercial development
States Parties: Ethiopia
Year: 2015
Document Source: WHC-15/39.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Structural instability of Stele 3
States Parties: Ethiopia
Year: 2013
Document Source: WHC-13/37.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Structural instability of Stele 3
States Parties: Ethiopia
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Lack of documentation and equipment
States Parties: Tunisia
Year: 1992
Document Source: CLT-92/CONF.003/2,WHC-92/CONF.002/5
Threats*: Commercial development
States Parties: Mauritania
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-2001/CONF.205/5
Threats*: Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure
States Parties: Bulgaria
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure
States Parties: Cambodia
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure
States Parties: Cambodia
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev
Threats*: Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Guatemala
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Commercial development
States Parties: Guatemala
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Commercial development
States Parties: Guatemala
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5
Threats*: Commercial development
States Parties: Libya
Year: 2015
Document Source: WHC-15/39.COM/7B.Add,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7Rev
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Libya
Year: 2014
Document Source: WHC-14/38.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Libya
Year: 2013
Document Source: WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Libya
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Libya
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Libya
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Inadequate on-site security and control systems

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top