State of Conservation
309
Reports
105
Properties concerned
68
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date end:2015close
States Parties: | Greece |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
Other Threats: | Worrying state of conservation of Agra Fort |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B.Corr |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
States Parties: | Ethiopia |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Structural instability of Stele 3 |
States Parties: | Ethiopia |
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Structural instability of Stele 3 |
States Parties: | Ethiopia |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Lack of documentation and equipment |
States Parties: | Tunisia |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | CLT-92/CONF.003/2,WHC-92/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
States Parties: | Mauritania |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
States Parties: | Bulgaria |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
States Parties: | Cambodia |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
States Parties: | Cambodia |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev |
Threats*: | Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Guatemala |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
States Parties: | Guatemala |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
States Parties: | Guatemala |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
States Parties: | Libya |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B.Add,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7Rev |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Libya |
Year: | 2014 |
Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Libya |
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Libya |
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Libya |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Libya |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Inadequate on-site security and control systems |
States Parties
Albania Algeria Argentina Austria Belgium Benin Bosnia and Herzegovina Brazil Bulgaria Cambodia Chile China Croatia Cyprus Dominican Republic Egypt Estonia Ethiopia France Germany Greece Guatemala Haiti Hungary India Indonesia Iran (Islamic Republic of) Ireland Italy Jordan Kenya Lao People's Democratic Republic Lebanon Libya Malaysia Mali Malta Mauritania Mauritius Mexico Morocco Mozambique Nepal Netherlands (Kingdom of the) Nigeria Oman Pakistan Panama Paraguay Peru Poland Portugal Russian Federation Senegal South Africa Spain Sudan Syrian Arab Republic Tunisia Türkiye Turkmenistan Ukraine United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania Uruguay Uzbekistan Viet Nam Yemen
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.