State of Conservation
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
Other Threats: | Worrying state of conservation of Agra Fort |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B.Corr |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
States Parties: | Tunisia |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | CLT-92/CONF.003/2,WHC-92/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
States Parties: | Guatemala |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
States Parties: | Guatemala |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
States Parties: | Guatemala |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
States Parties: | Poland |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
States Parties: | Poland |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
States Parties: | Poland |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.002/14 |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
Other Threats: | Threat to the integrity of the property (not specified - supermarket project?) |
States Parties: | Oman |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
Other Threats: | Deterioration of the earthen structures of the Fort; |
States Parties: | Oman |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
Other Threats: | Deterioration of the earthen structures of the Fort |
States Parties: | Oman |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
Other Threats: | Deterioration of the earthen structures of the Fort |
States Parties: | Oman |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
Other Threats: | Deterioration of the earthen structure of the Fort |
States Parties: | Oman |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Oman |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Oman |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/18 |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Belgium France |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
States Parties: | Belgium France |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
States Parties: | Indonesia |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
Other Threats: | Uncontrolled vendors around the property |
States Parties: | Indonesia |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Commercial development |
States Parties
Afghanistan Argentina Australia Belgium Brazil Chile China Ethiopia France Germany Guatemala India Indonesia Iran (Islamic Republic of) Jordan Kenya Lebanon Malta Mexico Morocco Nepal Oman Pakistan Paraguay Peru Poland Russian Federation South Africa Tunisia United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United States of America Uruguay Viet Nam
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.