State of Conservation
12
Reports
12
Properties concerned
13
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2006close
Date end:2006close
States Parties: | Mauritania |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Desertification |
States Parties: | Egypt |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B.Add,WHC-06/30.COM/7B.ADD2 |
Threats*: | Flooding |
States Parties: | Libya |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Flooding |
Other Threats: | Lack of maintenance, insufficient guardianship and control system inside and outside the archaeological area |
States Parties: | Iraq |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Flooding |
Other Threats: | Fragile mud brick structures |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Dominican Republic |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Storms |
Other Threats: | Deterioration of structures caused by natural and human hazards |
States Parties: | United States of America |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Storms |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Flooding |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Drought |
States Parties: | Algeria |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Flooding |
Other Threats: | Deterioration of the environment |
States Parties: | Zambia Zimbabwe |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Drought |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Temperature change |
States Parties: | Mali |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Flooding |
States Parties
Algeria Dominican Republic Egypt India Iraq Libya Mali Mauritania Nepal Peru United States of America Zambia Zimbabwe
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.