Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

6
Reports
6
Properties concerned
6
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date Start: 1994close
Date end:1994close
Threats* : Other climate change impactsclose Desertificationclose Floodingclose Changes to oceanic watersclose Droughtclose Temperature changeclose Stormsclose
Everglades National Park (1994)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.003/6,WHC-94/CONF.003/6 Add.
Threats*: Storms
Danger List:  Yes
Island of Mozambique (1994)
States Parties: Mozambique
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC.94/CONF.003/16
Threats*: Storms
Other Threats: Precarious state of conservation of the stone
Megalithic Temples of Malta (1994)
States Parties: Malta
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.003/6
Threats*: Storms
Other Threats: Worrying state of conservation of some temples; Fragility of the structures (cracks, etc.)
Royal Palaces of Abomey (1994)
States Parties: Benin
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.003/6,WHC-94/CONF.003/6 Add.
Threats*: Storms
Other Threats: Dilapidated state of conservation
Danger List:  Yes
Timbuktu (1994)
States Parties: Mali
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.001/3B Add.4,WHC-94/CONF.003/6,WHC-94/CONF.003/6 Add.
Threats*: Desertification
Other Threats: Vulnerability of the mosques
Danger List:  Yes
Xanthos-Letoon (1994)
States Parties: Türkiye
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.003/6,WHC-94/CONF.003/6 Add.
Threats*: Flooding
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Benin Mali Malta Mozambique Türkiye United States of America
Threats
Storms 4 Desertification 1 Flooding 1

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top