Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

11
Reports
3
Properties concerned
3
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Themes: Marine & coastalclose
Threats* : Management activitiesclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
everglades national parkEverglades National Park united states of america United States of America 2011 Management activities,
Other Threats: Mercury contamination of fish and wildlife
 Yes
everglades national parkEverglades National Park united states of america United States of America 2006 Management activities, Yes
everglades national parkEverglades National Park united states of america United States of America 2004 Management activities,
Other Threats: Concerns about numbers of boaters in Florida Bay and their impacts on bottomland wilderness, including especially propeller scars from boat groundings.
 Yes
galápagos islandsGalápagos Islands ecuador Ecuador 2014 Management activities, No
galápagos islandsGalápagos Islands ecuador Ecuador 2012 Management activities, No
galápagos islandsGalápagos Islands ecuador Ecuador 2009 Management activities,
Other Threats: h) Educational reform not implemented
 Yes
galápagos islandsGalápagos Islands ecuador Ecuador 2008 Management activities,
Other Threats: Educational reform not implemented.
 Yes
galápagos islandsGalápagos Islands ecuador Ecuador 2007 Management activities,
Other Threats: Educational reform not implemented
 No
galápagos islandsGalápagos Islands ecuador Ecuador 2006 Management activities, No
galápagos islandsGalápagos Islands ecuador Ecuador 2005 Management activities,
Other Threats: Implementation of quarantine measures
 No
sundarbans national parkSundarbans National Park india India 2002 Management activities,
Other Threats: human-tiger conflicts
 No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top