State of Conservation
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | WHC-92/CONF.002/12 |
Threats*: | Human resources |
Other Threats: | Need for restoration/consolidation works |
States Parties: | Zimbabwe |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B |
Threats*: | Human resources |
Other Threats: | Need for structural stabilization and repair of collapsed sections of walls |
States Parties: | Ethiopia |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B |
Threats*: | Human resources |
States Parties: | Malta |
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.201/4,WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
Threats*: | Human resources |
Other Threats: | Worrying state of conservation of some temples; Fragility of the structures (cracks, etc.); Partial collapse of a temple |
States Parties: | Bangladesh |
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.201/4 |
Threats*: | Human resources |
States Parties
Algeria Bangladesh Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Cambodia Ethiopia Germany Ghana Greece Malta Mozambique Nepal Peru ZimbabweThreats
Human resources 25
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.