State of Conservation
11
Reports
11
Properties concerned
11
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2005close
Date end:2005close
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
fort and shalamar gardens in lahoreFort and Shalamar Gardens in Lahore | pakistan Pakistan | 2005 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: a) Lack of capacity in conservation techniques; b) Lack of monitoring system |
Yes |
historic centre of sighişoaraHistoric Centre of Sighişoara | romania Romania | 2005 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: Deterioration of the monuments in general and the fortification in particular |
No |
historic sanctuary of machu picchuHistoric Sanctuary of Machu Picchu | peru Peru | 2005 | Financial resources, | No |
lamu old townLamu Old Town | kenya Kenya | 2005 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: a) Fire; b) Lack of law enforcement |
No |
lorentz national parkLorentz National Park | indonesia Indonesia | 2005 | Financial resources, | No |
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary | india India | 2005 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: Destruction to park infrastructure |
Yes |
purnululu national parkPurnululu National Park | australia Australia | 2005 | Financial resources, | No |
rice terraces of the philippine cordillerasRice Terraces of the Philippine Cordilleras | philippines Philippines | 2005 | Financial resources, | Yes |
robben islandRobben Island | south africa South Africa | 2005 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: a) Difficulties with operational aspects of maintenance and conservation implementation ; b) Lack of appropriate conservation of the built heritage; c) Lack of integration of natural values in management of site |
No |
ruins of the buddhist vihara at paharpurRuins of the Buddhist Vihara at Paharpur | bangladesh Bangladesh | 2005 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: Lack of monitoring system |
No |
rwenzori mountains national parkRwenzori Mountains National Park | uganda Uganda | 2005 | Financial resources,
Other Threats: a) Anti-personnel mines infestation in the park; b) Degradation of lands around the park |
No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.