Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

6
Reports
6
Properties concerned
6
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date Start: 2008close
Date end:2008close
Threats* : Avalanche/ landslideclose Erosion and siltation/ depositionclose Volcanic eruptionclose Fire (widlfires)close Earthquakeclose Tsunami/tidal waveclose
City of Quito (2008)
States Parties: Ecuador
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Earthquake
Fortifications on the Caribbean Side of Panama: Portobelo-San Lorenzo (2008)
States Parties: Panama
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition
Other Threats: Deterioration and destruction of the fabric of the property by environmental factors, lack of maintenance, as well as polluted water
Historical Centre of the City of Arequipa (2008)
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add2
Threats*: Earthquake
Other Threats: Material decay and abandonment of buildings
Natural and Culturo-Historical Region of Kotor (2008)
States Parties: Montenegro
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B
Threats*: Earthquake
Old Town of Galle and its Fortifications (2008)
States Parties: Sri Lanka
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Tsunami/tidal wave
Tipasa (2008)
States Parties: Algeria
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition
Other Threats: poor conservation conditions for the archaeological remains
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Algeria Ecuador Montenegro Panama Peru Sri Lanka
Threats
Earthquake 3 Erosion and siltation/ deposition 2 Tsunami/tidal wave 1

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top