State of Conservation
19
Reports
19
Properties concerned
22
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date Start:
1993close
Date end:1993close
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
air and tenere natural reservesAir and Ténéré Natural Reserves | niger Niger | 1993 | War, | Yes |
chitwan national parkChitwan National Park | nepal Nepal | 1993 | Illegal activities, Management systems/ management plan, | No |
danube deltaDanube Delta | romania Romania | 1993 | Legal framework, | No |
durmitor national parkDurmitor National Park | montenegro Montenegro | 1993 | Localised utilities, Surface water pollution, Water infrastructure, | No |
everglades national parkEverglades National Park | united states of america United States of America | 1993 | Crop production, Housing, Industrial areas, Storms, Surface water pollution, Water infrastructure, | No |
iguazu national parkIguazu National Park | argentina Argentina | 1993 | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, Input of excess energy, | No |
kluane / wrangell-st. elias / glacier bay / tatshenshini-alsekKluane / Wrangell-St. Elias / Glacier Bay / Tatshenshini-Alsek | canada,united states of america Canada United States of America |
1993 | Management systems/ management plan, | No |
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary | india India | 1993 | Civil unrest,
Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Illegal activities,
Land conversion,
Other Threats: Destruction of Park infrastructures; |
Yes |
manovo-gounda st floris national parkManovo-Gounda St Floris National Park | central african republic Central African Republic | 1993 | Illegal activities, Management systems/ management plan, | No |
mosi-oa-tunya / victoria fallsMosi-oa-Tunya / Victoria Falls | zambia,zimbabwe Zambia Zimbabwe |
1993 | Water infrastructure, | No |
mount nimba strict nature reserveMount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve | cote d'ivoire,guinea Côte d'Ivoire Guinea |
1993 | Financial resources, Ground transport infrastructure, Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Illegal activities, Management systems/ management plan, Mining, | Yes |
niokolo-koba national parkNiokolo-Koba National Park | senegal Senegal | 1993 | Ground transport infrastructure, Illegal activities, Management systems/ management plan, | No |
plitvice lakes national parkPlitvice Lakes National Park | croatia Croatia | 1993 | Illegal activities, War, | Yes |
sangay national parkSangay National Park | ecuador Ecuador | 1993 | Ground transport infrastructure, Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Illegal activities, Land conversion, Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals, Management systems/ management plan, | Yes |
sinharaja forest reserveSinharaja Forest Reserve | sri lanka Sri Lanka | 1993 | Land conversion,
Other Threats: Need to implement the Management Plan as a priority |
No |
srebarna nature reserveSrebarna Nature Reserve | bulgaria Bulgaria | 1993 | Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals,
Surface water pollution,
Water (extraction) ,
Water infrastructure,
Other Threats: Loss of biodiversity |
Yes |
talamanca range-la amistad reserves / la amistad national parkTalamanca Range-La Amistad Reserves / La Amistad National Park | costa rica,panama Costa Rica Panama |
1993 | Ground transport infrastructure, Management systems/ management plan, | No |
te wahipounamu – south west new zealandTe Wahipounamu – South West New Zealand | new zealand New Zealand | 1993 | Major linear utilities, Water (extraction) , Water infrastructure, | No |
virunga national parkVirunga National Park | democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo | 1993 | Civil unrest, Financial resources, Fishing/collecting aquatic resources, Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Illegal activities, Land conversion, Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals, Mining, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.