State of Conservation
147
Reports
29
Properties concerned
22
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date Start:
1996close
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Oil and gas |
Other Threats: | Lack of engagement with First Nations and Metis in monitoring activities and insufficient consideration of traditional ecological knowledge |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/09,WHC-01/CONF.208/9,WHC-2001/CONF.205/4 |
Threats*: | Oil and gas |
Other Threats: | Infection threat to bison population |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9 |
Threats*: | Oil and gas |
Other Threats: | Infection threat to bison population |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.209/13 |
Threats*: | Oil and gas |
Other Threats: | Infection threat to bison population |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/7 |
Threats*: | Oil and gas |
Other Threats: | Infection threat to bison population |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2A,WHC-97/CONF.208/8A |
Threats*: | Oil and gas |
Other Threats: | Infection threat to bison population |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7A,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B |
Threats*: | Oil and gas |
Other Threats: | Infection threat to bison population |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties
Australia Bangladesh Belize Cameroon Canada Central African Republic Côte d'Ivoire Democratic Republic of the Congo France Guinea Kenya Malawi Mauritania Oman Peru Philippines Russian Federation Spain United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania United States of America Viet NamThreats
Oil and gas 147
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.