State of Conservation
9
Reports
5
Properties concerned
5
States Parties with SOC reports
| States Parties: |
 Syrian Arab Republic
|
| Year: | 2024 |
| Document Source: | WHC/24/46.COM/7A |
| Threats*: | Military training |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
Syrian Arab Republic
|
| Year: |
2023
Initialy proposed for examination in 2022
|
| Document Source: | WHC/23/45.COM/7A.Add |
| Threats*: | Military training |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
 Lebanon
|
| Year: | 1998 |
| Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B |
| Threats*: | Military training |
| States Parties: |
 Afghanistan
|
| Year: | 2017 |
| Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7A.Add |
| Threats*: | Military training |
| Other Threats: | Risk of collapse of the Giant Buddha niches; Irreversible deterioration of the mural paintings |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
 Chile
|
| Year: | 2006 |
| Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7A |
| Threats*: | Military training |
| Other Threats: | a) Extremely fragile nature of the buildings that were constructed using local materials such as timber for frames, corrugated iron sheets for roofs and some walls, and stucco and lightweight construction that functioned with regular maintenanceb) Lack of maintenance for 40 years c) Metal cladding corroded and some of the structural elements dismantled. A few buildings, such as the Leaching house, are liable to structural collapse if no support is givend) Very little conservation work carried out |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
 India
|
| Year: | 2023 |
| Document Source: | WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Military training |
| States Parties: |
India
|
| Year: | 2021 |
| Document Source: | WHC/21/44.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Military training |
| States Parties: |
India
|
| Year: | 2019 |
| Document Source: | WHC/19/43.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Military training |
| States Parties: |
India
|
| Year: | 2017 |
| Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Military training |
Threats
Military training 9
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.
