Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

9
Reports
1
Properties concerned
1
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Property: City of Quitoclose
Date end:2013close
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
city of quitoCity of Quito ecuador Ecuador 2013 Housing, Management activities, Management systems/ management plan, Underground transport infrastructure, No
city of quitoCity of Quito ecuador Ecuador 2011 Housing, Management activities, Management systems/ management plan, No
city of quitoCity of Quito ecuador Ecuador 2010 Housing, Management systems/ management plan, No
city of quitoCity of Quito ecuador Ecuador 2009 Management activities, No
city of quitoCity of Quito ecuador Ecuador 2008 Earthquake, Housing, Management activities, No
city of quitoCity of Quito ecuador Ecuador 1999 Earthquake, Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, Financial resources, Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Volcanic eruption, No
city of quitoCity of Quito ecuador Ecuador 1998 Earthquake, Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, Financial resources, Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Volcanic eruption, No
city of quitoCity of Quito ecuador Ecuador 1993 Earthquake, Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, Financial resources, Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, No
city of quitoCity of Quito ecuador Ecuador 1990 Earthquake, Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top