Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

12
Reports
1
Properties concerned
1
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Property: Niokolo-Koba National Parkclose
Date end:2008close
Threats* : Ground transport infrastructureclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
niokolo-koba national parkNiokolo-Koba National Park senegal Senegal 2008 Ground transport infrastructure, Yes
niokolo-koba national parkNiokolo-Koba National Park senegal Senegal 2007 Ground transport infrastructure, No
niokolo-koba national parkNiokolo-Koba National Park senegal Senegal 2006 Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Serious deterioration in the state of conservation with regard to its large mammal fauna
 No
niokolo-koba national parkNiokolo-Koba National Park senegal Senegal 2001 Ground transport infrastructure, No
niokolo-koba national parkNiokolo-Koba National Park senegal Senegal 2000 Ground transport infrastructure, No
niokolo-koba national parkNiokolo-Koba National Park senegal Senegal 1993 Ground transport infrastructure, No
niokolo-koba national parkNiokolo-Koba National Park senegal Senegal 1992 Ground transport infrastructure, No
niokolo-koba national parkNiokolo-Koba National Park senegal Senegal 1990 Ground transport infrastructure, No
niokolo-koba national parkNiokolo-Koba National Park senegal Senegal 1989 Ground transport infrastructure, No
niokolo-koba national parkNiokolo-Koba National Park senegal Senegal 1988 Ground transport infrastructure, No
niokolo-koba national parkNiokolo-Koba National Park senegal Senegal 1987 Ground transport infrastructure, No
niokolo-koba national parkNiokolo-Koba National Park senegal Senegal 1986 Ground transport infrastructure, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top