State of Conservation
12
Reports
1
Properties concerned
1
States Parties with SOC reports
Property:
Kathmandu Valley close
Date end:2018close
| Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| kathmandu valleyKathmandu Valley | nepal Nepal |
2003 | Management activities,
Other Threats: Need for restoration/consolidation works |
No |
| kathmandu valleyKathmandu Valley | nepal Nepal |
2001 | Management activities,
Other Threats: Need for restoration/consolidation works |
No |
| kathmandu valleyKathmandu Valley | nepal Nepal |
2000 | Management activities,
Other Threats: Need for restoration/consolidation works |
No |
| kathmandu valleyKathmandu Valley | nepal Nepal |
1999 | Management activities,
Other Threats: Need for restoration/consolidation works |
No |
| kathmandu valleyKathmandu Valley | nepal Nepal |
1998 | Management activities,
Other Threats: Need for restoration/consolidation works |
No |
| kathmandu valleyKathmandu Valley | nepal Nepal |
1997 | Management activities,
Other Threats: Need for restoration/consolidation works |
No |
| kathmandu valleyKathmandu Valley | nepal Nepal |
1996 | Management activities,
Other Threats: Need for restoration/consolidation works |
No |
| kathmandu valleyKathmandu Valley | nepal Nepal |
1995 | Management activities,
Other Threats: Need for restoration/consolidation works |
No |
| kathmandu valleyKathmandu Valley | nepal Nepal |
1994 | Management activities,
Other Threats: Need for restoration/consolidation works |
No |
| kathmandu valleyKathmandu Valley | nepal Nepal |
1993 | Management activities,
Other Threats: Need for restoration/consolidation works |
No |
| kathmandu valleyKathmandu Valley | nepal Nepal |
1992 | Management activities,
Other Threats: Need for restoration/consolidation works |
No |
| kathmandu valleyKathmandu Valley | nepal Nepal |
1991 | Management activities,
Other Threats: Need for restoration/consolidation works |
No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.
