State of Conservation
12
Reports
3
Properties concerned
4
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:1991close
Region:
Africaclose
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
kahuzi-biega national parkKahuzi-Biega National Park | democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo | 1991 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
kahuzi-biega national parkKahuzi-Biega National Park | democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo | 1990 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
mount nimba strict nature reserveMount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve | cote d'ivoire,guinea Côte d'Ivoire Guinea |
1991 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
mount nimba strict nature reserveMount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve | cote d'ivoire,guinea Côte d'Ivoire Guinea |
1990 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
mount nimba strict nature reserveMount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve | cote d'ivoire,guinea Côte d'Ivoire Guinea |
1989 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
mount nimba strict nature reserveMount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve | cote d'ivoire,guinea Côte d'Ivoire Guinea |
1987 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
mount nimba strict nature reserveMount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve | cote d'ivoire,guinea Côte d'Ivoire Guinea |
1986 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
niokolo-koba national parkNiokolo-Koba National Park | senegal Senegal | 1990 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
niokolo-koba national parkNiokolo-Koba National Park | senegal Senegal | 1989 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
niokolo-koba national parkNiokolo-Koba National Park | senegal Senegal | 1988 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
niokolo-koba national parkNiokolo-Koba National Park | senegal Senegal | 1987 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
niokolo-koba national parkNiokolo-Koba National Park | senegal Senegal | 1986 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.