State of Conservation
9
Reports
6
Properties concerned
4
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date end:2012close
Region:
Africaclose
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
aksumAksum | ethiopia |
2005 | Interpretative and visitation facilities,
Other Threats: Lack of documentation and equipment |
No |
lower valley of the awashLower Valley of the Awash | ethiopia |
1996 | Interpretative and visitation facilities, | No |
old towns of djenneOld Towns of Djenné | mali |
1998 | Interpretative and visitation facilities, | No |
robben islandRobben Island | south africa |
2004 | Interpretative and visitation facilities,
Other Threats: a) Natural values and cultural landscape qualities are not yet reflected in the islands management structure and conservation priorities; b) Fire |
No |
robben islandRobben Island | south africa |
2003 | Interpretative and visitation facilities,
Other Threats: Natural values and cultural landscape qualities are not yet reflected in the islands management structure and conservation priorities |
No |
royal palaces of abomeyRoyal Palaces of Abomey | benin |
2012 | Interpretative and visitation facilities,
Other Threats: Fire; Major deterioration of almost 50% of the earthen structural components |
No |
royal palaces of abomeyRoyal Palaces of Abomey | benin |
2010 | Interpretative and visitation facilities,
Other Threats: Major deterioration of almost 50% of the earthen structural components |
No |
royal palaces of abomeyRoyal Palaces of Abomey | benin |
2008 | Interpretative and visitation facilities,
Other Threats: Major deterioration of almost 50% of the earthen structural components; |
No |
timbuktuTimbuktu | mali |
2003 | Interpretative and visitation facilities,
Other Threats: Lack of capacities in conservation techniques |
Yes |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.