State of Conservation
9
Reports
9
Properties concerned
8
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date Start:
2005close
Date end:2005close
Region:
Africaclose
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
aksumAksum | ethiopia |
2005 | Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Lack of documentation and equipment |
No |
island of goreeIsland of Gorée | senegal |
2005 | Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: a) Threatened state of the buildings; b) Construction of the replica of the Goree Memoria |
No |
island of saint-louisIsland of Saint-Louis | senegal |
2005 | Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Buildings threatened with collapse |
No |
lamu old townLamu Old Town | kenya |
2005 | Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: a) Fire; b) Lack of law enforcement |
No |
matobo hillsMatobo Hills | zimbabwe |
2005 | Management systems/ management plan, | No |
robben islandRobben Island | south africa |
2005 | Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: a) Difficulties with operational aspects of maintenance and conservation implementation ; b) Lack of appropriate conservation of the built heritage; c) Lack of integration of natural values in management of site |
No |
royal palaces of abomeyRoyal Palaces of Abomey | benin |
2005 | Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Serious degradation of nearly 2/3 of the mud-brick constructions |
Yes |
ruins of kilwa kisiwani and ruins of songo mnaraRuins of Kilwa Kisiwani and Ruins of Songo Mnara | united republic of tanzania |
2005 | Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: - Collapsing monuments- No participation of communit |
Yes |
timbuktuTimbuktu | mali |
2005 | Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: No protective measures for the buffer zone of the property |
Yes |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.