State of Conservation
89
Reports
20
Properties concerned
11
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date end:2010close
Region:
Africaclose
States Parties: | United Republic of Tanzania |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | United Republic of Tanzania |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | Environmental pressures |
States Parties: | United Republic of Tanzania |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | Environmental pressure |
States Parties: | Mali |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | a) Inappropriate design and scale of new Ahmed Baba Cultural Centre in the vicinity of the Sankoré Mosque; lack of detailed drawings supplied to the Committee; |
States Parties: | Mali |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | Lack of adequate maintenance of the buildings. |
States Parties: | Mali |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | Mali |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | No protective measures for the buffer zone of the property |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Mali |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | Lack of capacities in conservation techniques |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Ethiopia |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.