Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

89
Reports
20
Properties concerned
11
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date end:2010close
Threats* : Management systems/ management planclose
Region: Africaclose
States Parties: United Republic of Tanzania
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: United Republic of Tanzania
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Environmental pressures
States Parties: United Republic of Tanzania
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Environmental pressure
States Parties: Mali
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: a) Inappropriate design and scale of new Ahmed Baba Cultural Centre in the vicinity of the Sankoré Mosque; lack of detailed drawings supplied to the Committee;
States Parties: Mali
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Lack of adequate maintenance of the buildings.
States Parties: Mali
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Mali
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7A
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: No protective measures for the buffer zone of the property
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Mali
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7A
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Lack of capacities in conservation techniques
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Ethiopia
Year: 1996
Document Source: WHC-96/CONF.201/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top