State of Conservation
15
Reports
3
Properties concerned
3
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2004close
Region:
Arab Statesclose
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
ashur (qal'at sherqat)Ashur (Qal'at Sherqat) | iraq |
2004 | Water infrastructure,
Other Threats: Lack of maintenance |
Yes |
ichkeul national parkIchkeul National Park | tunisia |
2004 | Water infrastructure, | Yes |
ichkeul national parkIchkeul National Park | tunisia |
2003 | Water infrastructure,
Other Threats: Excessive salinity of the water |
Yes |
ichkeul national parkIchkeul National Park | tunisia |
2002 | Water infrastructure,
Other Threats: Excessive salinity of the water |
Yes |
ichkeul national parkIchkeul National Park | tunisia |
2001 | Water infrastructure,
Other Threats: Excessive salinity of the water |
Yes |
ichkeul national parkIchkeul National Park | tunisia |
2000 | Water infrastructure,
Other Threats: Excessive salinity of the water |
Yes |
ichkeul national parkIchkeul National Park | tunisia |
1999 | Water infrastructure,
Other Threats: Excessive salinity of the water |
Yes |
ichkeul national parkIchkeul National Park | tunisia |
1998 | Water infrastructure,
Other Threats: Excessive salinity of the water |
Yes |
ichkeul national parkIchkeul National Park | tunisia |
1997 | Water infrastructure, | Yes |
ichkeul national parkIchkeul National Park | tunisia |
1996 | Water infrastructure, | No |
ichkeul national parkIchkeul National Park | tunisia |
1989 | Water infrastructure, | No |
ichkeul national parkIchkeul National Park | tunisia |
1987 | Water infrastructure, | No |
ichkeul national parkIchkeul National Park | tunisia |
1986 | Water infrastructure, | No |
ichkeul national parkIchkeul National Park | tunisia |
1985 | Water infrastructure, | No |
medina of fezMedina of Fez | morocco |
2003 | Water infrastructure,
Other Threats: partial covering of the Oued Boukhrareb |
No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.