State of Conservation
10
Reports
6
Properties concerned
5
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2004close
Region:
Arab Statesclose
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
arabian oryx sanctuaryArabian Oryx Sanctuary | oman Oman | 2000 | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, | No |
arabian oryx sanctuaryArabian Oryx Sanctuary | oman Oman | 1999 | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, | No |
banc d'arguin national parkBanc d'Arguin National Park | mauritania Mauritania | 2004 | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, | No |
historic cairoHistoric Cairo | egypt Egypt | 2004 | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, | No |
historic city of meknesHistoric City of Meknes | morocco Morocco | 2000 | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, | No |
old city of jerusalem and its wallsOld City of Jerusalem and its Walls | jerusalem (site proposed by jordan)Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan) | 2004 | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure,
Other Threats: a) Lack of maintenance; b) Natural factors |
Yes |
site of palmyraSite of Palmyra | syrian arab republic Syrian Arab Republic | 1999 | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure,
Other Threats: serious weathering of many stone blocks |
No |
site of palmyraSite of Palmyra | syrian arab republic Syrian Arab Republic | 1998 | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure,
Other Threats: serious weathering of many stone blocks |
No |
site of palmyraSite of Palmyra | syrian arab republic Syrian Arab Republic | 1997 | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure,
Other Threats: serious weathering of many stone blocks |
No |
site of palmyraSite of Palmyra | syrian arab republic Syrian Arab Republic | 1994 | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure,
Other Threats: serious weathering of many stone blocks |
No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.