Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

8
Reports
8
Properties concerned
5
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date Start: 2009close
Date end:2009close
Threats* : Air transport infrastructureclose Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructureclose Ground transport infrastructureclose Marine transport infrastructureclose Underground transport infrastructureclose
Region: Arab Statesclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
abu menaAbu Mena egypt Egypt 2009 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, Yes
ancient thebes with its necropolisAncient Thebes with its Necropolis egypt Egypt 2009 Ground transport infrastructure, No
banc d'arguin national parkBanc d'Arguin National Park mauritania Mauritania 2009 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, No
kasbah of algiersKasbah of Algiers algeria Algeria 2009 Underground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: b) Lack of maintenance of dwelling places;
 No
old city of jerusalem and its wallsOld City of Jerusalem and its Walls jerusalem (site proposed by jordan)Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan) 2009 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure,
Other Threats: Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monuments
 Yes
qal’at al-bahrain – ancient harbour and capital of dilmunQal’at al-Bahrain – Ancient Harbour and Capital of Dilmun bahrain Bahrain 2009 Ground transport infrastructure, Marine transport infrastructure, No
tipasaTipasa algeria Algeria 2009 Marine transport infrastructure, No
tyreTyre lebanon Lebanon 2009 Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Insufficient maintenance
 No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top