State of Conservation
11
Reports
2
Properties concerned
2
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2013close
Region:
Latin America and the Caribbeanclose
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
lines and geoglyphs of nasca and palpaLines and Geoglyphs of Nasca and Palpa | peru |
2011 | Air transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Lack of systematic monitoring of the site |
No |
maya site of copanMaya Site of Copan | honduras |
2013 | Air transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Deterioration of construction materials due to natural decay phenomena |
No |
maya site of copanMaya Site of Copan | honduras |
2012 | Air transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Deterioration of construction materials due to natural decay phenomena |
No |
maya site of copanMaya Site of Copan | honduras |
2011 | Air transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: b) Deterioration of construction materials due to natural decay phenomena; |
No |
maya site of copanMaya Site of Copan | honduras |
2009 | Air transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Deterioration of construction materials due to natural decay phenomena |
No |
maya site of copanMaya Site of Copan | honduras |
2008 | Air transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Deterioration of construction materials due to natural decay phenomena |
No |
maya site of copanMaya Site of Copan | honduras |
2007 | Air transport infrastructure, | No |
maya site of copanMaya Site of Copan | honduras |
2006 | Air transport infrastructure, | No |
maya site of copanMaya Site of Copan | honduras |
2005 | Air transport infrastructure, | No |
maya site of copanMaya Site of Copan | honduras |
2004 | Air transport infrastructure, | No |
maya site of copanMaya Site of Copan | honduras |
2003 | Air transport infrastructure, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.