Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

5
Reports
5
Properties concerned
4
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date Start: 2011close
Date end:2011close
Threats* : Air transport infrastructureclose Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructureclose Marine transport infrastructureclose
Region: Latin America and the Caribbeanclose
City of Cuzco (2011)
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure
Historic Quarter of the City of Colonia del Sacramento (2011)
States Parties: Uruguay
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Marine transport infrastructure
Lines and Geoglyphs of Nasca and Palpa (2011)
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B
Threats*: Air transport infrastructure Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure
Other Threats: Lack of systematic monitoring of the site
Maya Site of Copan (2011)
States Parties: Honduras
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B
Threats*: Air transport infrastructure
Other Threats: b) Deterioration of construction materials due to natural decay phenomena;
San Agustín Archaeological Park (2011)
States Parties: Colombia
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B
Threats*: Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure
Other Threats: State of conservation of the fabric of the megalithic sculptures
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Colombia Honduras Peru Uruguay
Threats
Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure 3 Air transport infrastructure 2 Marine transport infrastructure 1

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top