Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

9
Reports
9
Properties concerned
7
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date Start: 2005close
Date end:2005close
Region: Asia and the Pacificclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
east rennellEast Rennell solomon islands Solomon Islands 2005 Legal framework, Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Disappointment, confusion, suspicion, division and anger within the community
No
keoladeo national parkKeoladeo National Park india India 2005 Drought, Water (extraction) , Water infrastructure, No
lorentz national parkLorentz National Park indonesia Indonesia 2005 Civil unrest, Financial resources, Fishing/collecting aquatic resources, Governance, Housing, Management systems/ management plan, Mining, No
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary india India 2005 Civil unrest, Financial resources, Human resources, Illegal activities,
Other Threats: Destruction to park infrastructure
Yes
phong nha-ke bang national parkPhong Nha-Ke Bang National Park viet nam Viet Nam 2005 Ground transport infrastructure, Illegal activities, Management systems/ management plan, No
purnululu national parkPurnululu National Park australia Australia 2005 Financial resources, Human resources, Mining, No
three parallel rivers of yunnan protected areasThree Parallel Rivers of Yunnan Protected Areas china China 2005 Water infrastructure, No
tropical rainforest heritage of sumatraTropical Rainforest Heritage of Sumatra indonesia Indonesia 2005 Crop production, Ground transport infrastructure, Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Illegal activities, Land conversion, Mining, Tsunami/tidal wave, No
tubbataha reefs natural parkTubbataha Reefs Natural Park philippines Philippines 2005 Fishing/collecting aquatic resources, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top