State of Conservation
52
Reports
14
Properties concerned
10
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2017close
Region:
Asia and the Pacificclose
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Apparent decline in wildlife populations |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Signage; Apparent decline in wildlife populations |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
Other Threats: | signage |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | CLT-92/CONF.003/3,WHC-92/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 1991 |
Document Source: | SC-91/CONF.002/4 |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties
Australia Bangladesh China India Japan Malaysia New Zealand Pakistan Philippines ThailandThreats
Water infrastructure 52
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.