State of Conservation
13
Reports
3
Properties concerned
3
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:1996close
Region:
Asia and the Pacificclose
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
kathmandu valleyKathmandu Valley | nepal Nepal | 1996 | Land conversion,
Other Threats: Need for restoration/consolidation works |
No |
kathmandu valleyKathmandu Valley | nepal Nepal | 1995 | Land conversion,
Other Threats: Need for restoration/consolidation works |
No |
kathmandu valleyKathmandu Valley | nepal Nepal | 1994 | Land conversion,
Other Threats: Need for restoration/consolidation works |
No |
kathmandu valleyKathmandu Valley | nepal Nepal | 1993 | Land conversion,
Other Threats: Need for restoration/consolidation works |
No |
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary | india India | 1996 | Land conversion,
Other Threats: Destruction of Park infrastructures |
Yes |
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary | india India | 1995 | Land conversion,
Other Threats: Destruction of Park infrastructures |
Yes |
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary | india India | 1994 | Land conversion,
Other Threats: Destruction of Park infrastructures |
Yes |
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary | india India | 1993 | Land conversion,
Other Threats: Destruction of Park infrastructures; |
Yes |
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary | india India | 1992 | Land conversion,
Other Threats: Destruction of Park infrastructures |
No |
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary | india India | 1991 | Land conversion, | No |
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary | india India | 1990 | Land conversion, | No |
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary | india India | 1989 | Land conversion, | No |
sinharaja forest reserveSinharaja Forest Reserve | sri lanka Sri Lanka | 1993 | Land conversion,
Other Threats: Need to implement the Management Plan as a priority |
No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.