State of Conservation
12
Reports
4
Properties concerned
5
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
1994close
Region:
Europe and North Americaclose
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
curonian spitCuronian Spit | lithuania,russian federation Lithuania Russian Federation |
2006 | Pollution of marine waters, | No |
curonian spitCuronian Spit | lithuania,russian federation Lithuania Russian Federation |
2005 | Pollution of marine waters, | No |
donana national parkDoñana National Park | spain Spain | 2017 | Pollution of marine waters,
Other Threats: Guadalquivir River dredging project |
No |
donana national parkDoñana National Park | spain Spain | 2015 | Pollution of marine waters,
Other Threats: State of the Guadalquivir River and dredging project |
No |
donana national parkDoñana National Park | spain Spain | 2014 | Pollution of marine waters,
Other Threats: State of the Guadalquivir River and dredging project |
No |
donana national parkDoñana National Park | spain Spain | 2013 | Pollution of marine waters,
Other Threats: State of the Guadalquivir River and dredging project |
No |
donana national parkDoñana National Park | spain Spain | 2011 | Pollution of marine waters, | No |
donana national parkDoñana National Park | spain Spain | 2010 | Pollution of marine waters, | No |
donana national parkDoñana National Park | spain Spain | 2005 | Pollution of marine waters, | No |
donana national parkDoñana National Park | spain Spain | 2004 | Pollution of marine waters, | No |
dorset and east devon coastDorset and East Devon Coast | united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland | 2007 | Pollution of marine waters, | No |
everglades national parkEverglades National Park | united states of america United States of America | 2011 | Pollution of marine waters,
Other Threats: Mercury contamination of fish and wildlife |
Yes |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.