Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

5
Reports
5
Properties concerned
6
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date Start: 2003close
Date end:2003close
Threats* : Aquacultureclose Commercial huntingclose Subsistence huntingclose Commercial wild plant collectionclose Subsistence wild plant collectionclose Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animalsclose Forestry /wood productionclose Land conversionclose Fishing/collecting aquatic resourcesclose Crop productionclose
Region: Europe and North Americaclose
Białowieża Forest (2003)
States Parties: Belarus Poland
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Forestry /wood production
Butrint (2003)
States Parties: Albania
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7A
Threats*: Land conversion
Other Threats: Need for monitoring of the situation at the site
Danger List:  Yes
Everglades National Park (2003)
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7A
Threats*: Crop production
Danger List:  Yes
Lake Baikal (2003)
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Forestry /wood production
Other Threats: Continuing decline of the Baikal Seal population
Srebarna Nature Reserve (2003)
States Parties: Bulgaria
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7A
Threats*: Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals
Other Threats: Loss of biodiversity
Danger List:  Yes
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Albania Belarus Bulgaria Poland Russian Federation United States of America
Threats
Forestry /wood production 2 Crop production 1 Land conversion 1 Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals 1

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top