State of Conservation
11
Reports
5
Properties concerned
5
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date Start:
2004close
Region:
Europe and North Americaclose
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
białowieża forestBiałowieża Forest | belarus,poland |
2004 | Air pollution,
Other Threats: Fencing along the international border |
No |
great smoky mountains national parkGreat Smoky Mountains National Park | united states of america |
2006 | Air pollution, | No |
plitvice lakes national parkPlitvice Lakes National Park | croatia |
2021 | Air pollution, | No |
plitvice lakes national parkPlitvice Lakes National Park | croatia |
2018 | Air pollution, | No |
wood buffalo national parkWood Buffalo National Park | canada |
2023 | Air pollution,
Other Threats: Lack of engagement with First Nations and Metis in monitoring activities and insufficient consideration of traditional ecological knowledge; Insufficiently understood cumulative impacts of multiple development pressures |
No |
wood buffalo national parkWood Buffalo National Park | canada |
2021 | Air pollution,
Other Threats: Lack of engagement with First Nations and Metis in monitoring activities and insufficient consideration of traditional ecological knowledge; Insufficiently understood cumulative impacts of multiple development pressures |
No |
yellowstone national parkYellowstone National Park | united states of america |
2012 | Air pollution, | No |
yellowstone national parkYellowstone National Park | united states of america |
2010 | Air pollution, | No |
yellowstone national parkYellowstone National Park | united states of america |
2008 | Air pollution, | No |
yellowstone national parkYellowstone National Park | united states of america |
2006 | Air pollution, | No |
yellowstone national parkYellowstone National Park | united states of america |
2005 | Air pollution, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.