Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

11
Reports
4
Properties concerned
2
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date end:2004close
Threats* : Financial resourcesclose
Region: Europe and North Americaclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
lake baikalLake Baikal russian federation Russian Federation 2003 Financial resources,
Other Threats: Continuing decline of the Baikal Seal population
No
lake baikalLake Baikal russian federation Russian Federation 2002 Financial resources,
Other Threats: Continuing decline of the Baikal Seal population
No
lake baikalLake Baikal russian federation Russian Federation 2001 Financial resources,
Other Threats: Continuing decline of the Baikal Seal population
No
lake baikalLake Baikal russian federation Russian Federation 2000 Financial resources, No
lake baikalLake Baikal russian federation Russian Federation 1999 Financial resources, No
lake baikalLake Baikal russian federation Russian Federation 1998 Financial resources, No
pirin national parkPirin National Park bulgaria Bulgaria 2004 Financial resources, No
srebarna nature reserveSrebarna Nature Reserve bulgaria Bulgaria 2003 Financial resources,
Other Threats: Loss of biodiversity
 Yes
srebarna nature reserveSrebarna Nature Reserve bulgaria Bulgaria 2002 Financial resources,
Other Threats: Loss of biodiversity
 Yes
srebarna nature reserveSrebarna Nature Reserve bulgaria Bulgaria 2001 Financial resources,
Other Threats: Loss of biodiversity
 Yes
volcanoes of kamchatkaVolcanoes of Kamchatka russian federation Russian Federation 2004 Financial resources, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top