State of Conservation
9
Reports
9
Properties concerned
19
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date Start:
2013close
Date end:2013close
Region:
Europe and North Americaclose
| Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ancient and primeval beech forests of the carpathians and other regions of europeAncient and Primeval Beech Forests of the Carpathians and Other Regions of Europe | albania,austria,belgium,bosnia and herzegovina,bulgaria,croatia,czechia,france,germany,italy,north macedonia,poland,romania,slovakia,slovenia,spain,switzerland,ukraine Albania Austria Bosnia and Herzegovina Belgium Bulgaria Switzerland Czechia Germany Spain France Croatia Italy North Macedonia Poland Romania Slovenia Slovakia Ukraine |
2013 | Management systems/ management plan, | No |
| gulf of porto: calanche of piana, gulf of girolata, scandola reserveGulf of Porto: Calanche of Piana, Gulf of Girolata, Scandola Reserve | france France |
2013 | Management systems/ management plan, | No |
| lake baikalLake Baikal | russian federation Russian Federation |
2013 | Management systems/ management plan, | No |
| monte san giorgioMonte San Giorgio | italy,switzerland Switzerland Italy |
2013 | Management systems/ management plan, | No |
| pirin national parkPirin National Park | bulgaria Bulgaria |
2013 | Management systems/ management plan, | No |
| pitons, cirques and remparts of reunion islandPitons, cirques and remparts of Reunion Island | france France |
2013 | Management systems/ management plan, | No |
| virgin komi forestsVirgin Komi Forests | russian federation Russian Federation |
2013 | Management systems/ management plan, | No |
| volcanoes of kamchatkaVolcanoes of Kamchatka | russian federation Russian Federation |
2013 | Management systems/ management plan, | No |
| western caucasusWestern Caucasus | russian federation Russian Federation |
2013 | Management systems/ management plan, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.
