State of Conservation
9
Reports
9
Properties concerned
7
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date Start:
2002close
Date end:2002close
Region:
Europe and North Americaclose
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
donana national parkDoñana National Park | spain Spain | 2002 | Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Decline of the Iberian lynx and Imperial eagle populations |
No |
everglades national parkEverglades National Park | united states of america United States of America | 2002 | Management systems/ management plan, | Yes |
giant's causeway and causeway coastGiant's Causeway and Causeway Coast | united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland | 2002 | Management systems/ management plan, | No |
henderson islandHenderson Island | united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland | 2002 | Management systems/ management plan, | No |
isole eolie (aeolian islands)Isole Eolie (Aeolian Islands) | italy Italy | 2002 | Management systems/ management plan, | No |
lake baikalLake Baikal | russian federation Russian Federation | 2002 | Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Continuing decline of the Baikal Seal population |
No |
nahanni national parkNahanni National Park | canada Canada | 2002 | Management systems/ management plan, | No |
srebarna nature reserveSrebarna Nature Reserve | bulgaria Bulgaria | 2002 | Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Loss of biodiversity |
Yes |
yellowstone national parkYellowstone National Park | united states of america United States of America | 2002 | Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Wildlife infection and transmission to domestic stock |
Yes |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.