Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

49
Reports
17
Properties concerned
17
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date end:2004close
Threats* : Forestry /wood productionclose
Białowieża Forest (2004)
States Parties: Belarus Poland
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Forestry /wood production
Other Threats: Fencing along the international border
Białowieża Forest (2003)
States Parties: Belarus Poland
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Forestry /wood production
Białowieża Forest (2001)
States Parties: Belarus Poland
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5
Threats*: Forestry /wood production
Białowieża Forest (2000)
States Parties: Belarus Poland
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.203/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Forestry /wood production
Białowieża Forest (1999)
States Parties: Belarus Poland
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14,WHC.99/CONF.208/5
Threats*: Forestry /wood production
Białowieża Forest (1998)
States Parties: Belarus Poland
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev.
Threats*: Forestry /wood production
Białowieża Forest (1997)
States Parties: Belarus Poland
Year: 1997
Document Source: WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B
Threats*: Forestry /wood production
Canadian Rocky Mountain Parks (1998)
States Parties: Canada
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev.
Threats*: Forestry /wood production
Canadian Rocky Mountain Parks (1997)
States Parties: Canada
Year: 1997
Document Source: WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B
Threats*: Forestry /wood production
Dja Faunal Reserve (2003)
States Parties: Cameroon
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Forestry /wood production
Dja Faunal Reserve (2001)
States Parties: Cameroon
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10
Threats*: Forestry /wood production
Dja Faunal Reserve (2000)
States Parties: Cameroon
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.203/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Forestry /wood production
Dja Faunal Reserve (1999)
States Parties: Cameroon
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.209/14,WHC.99/CONF.208/5
Threats*: Forestry /wood production
Dja Faunal Reserve (1998)
States Parties: Cameroon
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev.
Threats*: Forestry /wood production
Dja Faunal Reserve (1997)
States Parties: Cameroon
Year: 1997
Document Source: WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B
Threats*: Forestry /wood production
Gros Morne National Park (2001)
States Parties: Canada
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5
Threats*: Forestry /wood production
Gros Morne National Park (2000)
States Parties: Canada
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.203/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Forestry /wood production
Lake Baikal (2003)
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Forestry /wood production
Other Threats: Continuing decline of the Baikal Seal population
Lake Baikal (2002)
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17
Threats*: Forestry /wood production
Other Threats: Continuing decline of the Baikal Seal population
Lake Baikal (2001)
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.207/INF.8,WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5
Threats*: Forestry /wood production
Other Threats: Continuing decline of the Baikal Seal population
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Australia Belarus Cameroon Canada Côte d'Ivoire Ecuador Greece Guinea Indonesia Japan Malawi New Zealand Peru Poland Russian Federation Uganda United States of America
Threats
Forestry /wood production 49

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top