State of Conservation
126
Reports
34
Properties concerned
30
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date Start:
2011close
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7A,WHC/17/41.COM/INF.7 Rev |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7A,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7Rev |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2014 |
Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2019 |
Document Source: | WHC/19/43.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2018 |
Document Source: | WHC/18/42.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2014 |
Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Impact of the new structure of the Maya Devi Temple (constructed in 2002) on the archaeological remains, as well as on the visual integrity. |
States Parties: | Kazakhstan |
Year: |
2023
Initialy proposed for examination in 2022
|
Document Source: | WHC/23/45.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Kazakhstan |
Year: |
2021
Initialy proposed for examination in 2020
|
Document Source: | WHC/21/44.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Kazakhstan |
Year: | 2019 |
Document Source: | WHC/19/43.COM/7B.add.2,WHC/19/43.COM/INF.7.Rev.4 |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Egypt |
Year: | 2023 |
Document Source: | WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Urban encroachment |
States Parties: | Egypt |
Year: | 2021 |
Document Source: | WHC/21/44.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Urban encroachment |
States Parties: | Egypt |
Year: | 2019 |
Document Source: | WHC/19/43.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Egypt |
Year: | 2018 |
Document Source: | WHC/18/42.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Egypt |
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Egypt |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties
Argentina Belgium Benin Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Czechia Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt Ethiopia France Georgia Ghana Indonesia Iraq Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Libya Nepal Netherlands (Kingdom of the) Peru Russian Federation Saudi Arabia South Africa United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.