State of Conservation
8
Reports
8
Properties concerned
7
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2016close
Date end:2016close
States Parties: | Mauritania |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Vulnerabilities of certain individual structures within the forts requiring short-term conservation actions |
States Parties: | Haiti |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan) |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7A.Add.2 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monuments |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Türkiye |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Need to improve the monitoring system by specifying which organization is responsible for monitoring each indicator and include seismic monitoring |
States Parties: | Iran (Islamic Republic of) |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Syrian Arab Republic |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Other Threats: | serious weathering of many stone blocks |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Italy |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.