Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

17
Reports
5
Properties concerned
5
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date end:2018close
Threats* : Indigenous hunting, gathering and collectingclose
Great Himalayan National Park Conservation Area (2016)
States Parties: India
Year: 2016
Document Source: WHC/16/40.COM/7B
Threats*: Indigenous hunting, gathering and collecting
Other Threats: Rights issues with respect to local communities and indigenous peoples in the Tirthan and Sainj Wildlife Sanctuaries
Los Katíos National Park (2009)
States Parties: Colombia
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Indigenous hunting, gathering and collecting
Rainforests of the Atsinanana (2010)
States Parties: Madagascar
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Indigenous hunting, gathering and collecting
Salonga National Park (2018)
States Parties: Democratic Republic of the Congo
Year: 2018
Document Source: WHC/18/42.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Indigenous hunting, gathering and collecting
Danger List:  Yes
Salonga National Park (2017)
States Parties: Democratic Republic of the Congo
Year: 2017
Document Source: WHC/17/41.COM/7A,WHC/17/41.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Indigenous hunting, gathering and collecting
Danger List:  Yes
Salonga National Park (2016)
States Parties: Democratic Republic of the Congo
Year: 2016
Document Source: WHC/16/40.COM/7A
Threats*: Indigenous hunting, gathering and collecting
Danger List:  Yes
Salonga National Park (2015)
States Parties: Democratic Republic of the Congo
Year: 2015
Document Source: WHC-15/39.COM/7A
Threats*: Indigenous hunting, gathering and collecting
Danger List:  Yes
Salonga National Park (2014)
States Parties: Democratic Republic of the Congo
Year: 2014
Document Source: WHC-14/38.COM/7A
Threats*: Indigenous hunting, gathering and collecting
Danger List:  Yes
Salonga National Park (2013)
States Parties: Democratic Republic of the Congo
Year: 2013
Document Source: WHC-13/37.COM/7A
Threats*: Indigenous hunting, gathering and collecting
Danger List:  Yes
Salonga National Park (2012)
States Parties: Democratic Republic of the Congo
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Indigenous hunting, gathering and collecting
Danger List:  Yes
Salonga National Park (2011)
States Parties: Democratic Republic of the Congo
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Indigenous hunting, gathering and collecting
Danger List:  Yes
Salonga National Park (2010)
States Parties: Democratic Republic of the Congo
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7A
Threats*: Indigenous hunting, gathering and collecting
Danger List:  Yes
Salonga National Park (2009)
States Parties: Democratic Republic of the Congo
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7A
Threats*: Indigenous hunting, gathering and collecting
Danger List:  Yes
Salonga National Park (2008)
States Parties: Democratic Republic of the Congo
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7A
Threats*: Indigenous hunting, gathering and collecting
Danger List:  Yes
Salonga National Park (2007)
States Parties: Democratic Republic of the Congo
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Indigenous hunting, gathering and collecting
Danger List:  Yes
Salonga National Park (2006)
States Parties: Democratic Republic of the Congo
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7A
Threats*: Indigenous hunting, gathering and collecting
Danger List:  Yes
Volcanoes of Kamchatka (2003)
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Indigenous hunting, gathering and collecting
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Colombia Democratic Republic of the Congo India Madagascar Russian Federation
Threats
Indigenous hunting, gathering and collecting 17

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top