State of Conservation
9
Reports
9
Properties concerned
6
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2009close
Date end:2009close
States Parties: | Egypt |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Water (rain/water table) |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Egypt |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Water (rain/water table) |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Water (rain/water table) |
Other Threats: | Continuous deterioration of earthen architecture structures and decorated surfaces from lack of conservation and maintenance practices |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Senegal |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Water (rain/water table) |
Other Threats: | Salinisation of soils |
States Parties: | Egypt |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Water (rain/water table) |
Other Threats: | Dilapidated infrastructure; Neglect and lack of maintenance |
States Parties: | Senegal |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Water (rain/water table) |
Other Threats: | Extremely poor state of conservation of numerous derelict buildings endangering occupants; |
States Parties: | Denmark |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Water (rain/water table) |
Other Threats: | surface deterioration of two runic stones, part of the overall property |
States Parties: | Ethiopia |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Water (rain/water table) |
Other Threats: | Geological and architectural characteristics of the churches. |
States Parties: | Bangladesh |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Water (rain/water table) |
Threats
Water (rain/water table) 9
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.