State of Conservation
28
Reports
6
Properties concerned
4
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date Start:
2009close
Region:
Arab Statesclose
States Parties: | Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan) |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7A.Add.2 |
Threats*: | Governance |
Other Threats: | Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monuments |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan) |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Governance |
Other Threats: | Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monuments |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan) |
Year: | 2014 |
Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Governance |
Other Threats: | Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monuments |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan) |
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7A.Add.2 |
Threats*: | Governance |
Other Threats: | Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monuments |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan) |
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Governance |
Other Threats: | Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monuments |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan) |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Governance |
Other Threats: | Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monuments; |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan) |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Governance |
Other Threats: | Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monuments; |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan) |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Governance |
Other Threats: | Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monuments |
Danger List: | Yes |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.