State of Conservation
81
Reports
40
Properties concerned
32
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date end:2011close
States Parties: | Dominican Republic |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Dominican Republic |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Dominican Republic |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Dominican Republic |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Deterioration of structures caused by natural and human hazards |
States Parties: | Dominican Republic |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Deterioration of structures caused by natural and human hazards |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Structural degradation of its components of the property |
States Parties: | Türkiye |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected areas (mainly the Ottoman period timber houses in the district of Zeyrek and Süleymaniye) |
States Parties: | Belgium |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Paraguay |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Argentina Brazil |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Ethiopia |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Malta |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Malta |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Egypt |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | France |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Mali |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Cyprus |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties
Albania Algeria Argentina Belgium Benin Brazil Cambodia China Cyprus Dominican Republic Egypt Ethiopia France Germany Greece Indonesia Ireland Italy Jordan Lao People's Democratic Republic Libya Mali Malta Morocco Paraguay Peru Poland Russian Federation South Africa Türkiye Turkmenistan United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.