State of Conservation
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Industrial areas |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Industrial areas |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Industrial areas |
Other Threats: | Aggressive natural environment |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Industrial areas |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Industrial areas |
Other Threats: | Fire |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add.2 |
Threats*: | Industrial areas |
Other Threats: | Lack of adequate sewerage, waste disposal, and overall infrastructure, and risk to limited fresh water supplies; Fire |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Industrial areas |
Other Threats: | Fire |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2014 |
Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Industrial areas |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Industrial areas |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2014 |
Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Industrial areas |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
Threats*: | Industrial areas |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Industrial areas |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Industrial areas |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Industrial areas |
States Parties
Argentina Brazil Ethiopia India Kenya Nepal Pakistan Paraguay South Africa United States of America Viet NamThreats
Industrial areas 34
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.