State of Conservation
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B |
Threats*: | Deliberate destruction of heritage |
States Parties: | Mauritania |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Deliberate destruction of heritage |
States Parties: | Egypt |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Deliberate destruction of heritage |
States Parties: | Egypt |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add2 |
Threats*: | Deliberate destruction of heritage |
States Parties: | Egypt |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add.2 |
Threats*: | Deliberate destruction of heritage |
States Parties: | Egypt |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B.Add,WHC-06/30.COM/7B.ADD2 |
Threats*: | Deliberate destruction of heritage |
States Parties: | Cambodia |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev |
Threats*: | Deliberate destruction of heritage |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Libya |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Deliberate destruction of heritage |
Other Threats: | Inadequate on-site security and control systems |
States Parties: | Libya |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Deliberate destruction of heritage |
Other Threats: | Lack of maintenance, insufficient guardianship and control system inside and outside the archaeological area |
States Parties: | Libya |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Deliberate destruction of heritage |
Other Threats: | Uncontrolled growth of plants and trees |
States Parties: | Panama |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Deliberate destruction of heritage |
Other Threats: | Severe deterioration of historic buildings that threatens the Outstanding universal value of the property |
States Parties: | Belarus |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Deliberate destruction of heritage |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
Threats*: | Deliberate destruction of heritage |
States Parties: | France |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Deliberate destruction of heritage |
States Parties: | France |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Deliberate destruction of heritage |
States Parties: | Indonesia |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Deliberate destruction of heritage |
Other Threats: | Uncontrolled vendors within and around the property |
States Parties: | Hungary |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Deliberate destruction of heritage |
Other Threats: | Lack of conservation of residential housing in the area inscribed as World Heritage |
States Parties: | Austria |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Deliberate destruction of heritage |
States Parties: | Afghanistan |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Deliberate destruction of heritage |
Other Threats: | a) Risk of imminent collapse of the Giant Buddha nichesb) Irreversible deterioration of the mural paintingse) Anti-personnel mines and unexploded ordinances (i.e. munitions) |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Afghanistan |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Deliberate destruction of heritage |
Other Threats: | Risk of imminent collapse of the Buddha niches; Irreversible deterioration of the mural paintings |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties
Afghanistan Algeria Australia Austria Azerbaijan Belarus Cambodia Chile China Egypt France Germany Hungary India Indonesia Italy Kenya Lao People's Democratic Republic Libya Lithuania Malta Mauritania Mexico Morocco Nepal Norway Pakistan Panama Peru Russian Federation South Africa Spain Türkiye Uzbekistan Yemen
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.