State of Conservation
States Parties: | Senegal |
Year: | 1986 |
Document Source: | CC-86/CONF.001/11,CC-86/CONF.003/INF.4 |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Senegal |
Year: | 1985 |
Document Source: | SC-85/CONF.008/9 |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Senegal |
Year: | 1984 |
Document Source: | SC-84/CONF.001/4,SC/84/CONF.004/4 |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: | Senegal |
Year: | 1983 |
Document Source: | SC/83/CONF.009/8 |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: | Senegal |
Year: | 1982 |
Document Source: | CLT-82/CONF.015/8 |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: | Montenegro |
Year: | 1985 |
Document Source: | SC-85/CONF.008/9 |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: | Montenegro |
Year: | 1984 |
Document Source: | SC/84/CONF.004/9 |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: | Tunisia |
Year: | 1986 |
Document Source: | CC-86/CONF.001/11,CC-86/CONF.003/INF.4 |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: | Tunisia |
Year: | 1985 |
Document Source: | SC-85/CONF.008/9 |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: | Argentina |
Year: | 1986 |
Document Source: | CC-86/CONF.001/11,CC-86/CONF.003/INF.4 |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 1986 |
Document Source: | CC-86/CONF.003/INF.4 |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 1984 |
Document Source: | SC/84/CONF.004/7,SC/84/CONF.004/9 |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 1983 |
Document Source: | SC/83/CONF.009/INF.5 |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
States Parties: | Canada |
Year: | 1985 |
Document Source: | SC-85/CONF.008/9 |
Threats*: | Water infrastructure |
Threats
Water infrastructure 14
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.