Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

27
Reports
9
Properties concerned
7
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date end:2018close
Threats* : Interpretative and visitation facilitiesclose
Region: Arab Statesclose
Petra (2018)
States Parties: Jordan
Year: 2018
Document Source: WHC/18/42.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Petra (2017)
States Parties: Jordan
Year: 2017
Document Source: WHC/17/41.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Quseir Amra (1998)
States Parties: Jordan
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev.
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Rock Art in the Hail Region of Saudi Arabia (2017)
States Parties: Saudi Arabia
Year: 2017
Document Source: WHC/17/41.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Visual impact of a rain water diversionary dam and of a water tower
Tipasa (2003)
States Parties: Algeria
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7A
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Deterioration of the archaeological vestiges
Danger List:  Yes
Um er-Rasas (Kastrom Mefa'a) (2008)
States Parties: Jordan
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Unstable structures and lack of security
Um er-Rasas (Kastrom Mefa'a) (2006)
States Parties: Jordan
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Lack of security and risk of collapse due to open trenches and unstable structures
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Algeria Egypt Iraq Jordan Libya Morocco Saudi Arabia
Threats
Interpretative and visitation facilities 27

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top