L'viv – the Ensemble of the Historic Centre
Factors affecting the property in 2011*
- Housing
- Management systems/ management plan
- Solid waste
Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports
a) New constructions within the historic centre;
b) Lack of valid detailed planning documents;
c) Inadequate infrastructure including the sewage system
International Assistance: requests for the property until 2011
Total amount approved : 0 USD
Missions to the property until 2011**
2004: ICOMOS-German World Heritage Foundation mission; March 2010: joint World Heritage Centre / ICOMOS reactive monitoring mission.
Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2011
The State Party submitted the state of conservation report on 28 January 2011.
a) Management plan and Master plan
At its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010), the World Heritage Committee requested the State Party to submit the Strategic Management Plan and the Master plan of the property to the World Heritage Centre, along with the state of conservation report. The report states that, following approval and confirmation by the L’viv City Council Deputies, the Strategic Management Plan and Integrated Concept of Central Part of L’viv Development will be transmitted to the Centre by May 2011. Approved by the L’viv City Council, the Master Plan of L’viv was submitted to the World Heritage Centre, along with the report.
b) State of conservation
The State Party report assures the World Heritage Centre that, in response to the World Heritage Committee concerns, the urban structure of the property has not changed since its last session. The report also confirms that all new construction projects have been submitted to the World Heritage Committee for recommendations, and no steps towards their implementation have taken place. Furthermore, it states that restoration works are planned in agreement with the project documentation developed according to the State Restoration Standards and Rules, and are examined and approved by the Ministry of Culture and the Tourism Central body for heritage protection. With a view to creating a supervisory board for the constant monitoring of World Heritage properties in Ukraine, a draft amendment to the Cultural Heritage Protection Act of Ukraine is currently under discussion.
c) Development projects
The State Party report informs that the investor of the Citadel area hotel project has halted all construction activities. The State Party underlines that any action on the Citadel site will occur only after analysing the potential impact on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (OUV), and following submission of all plans to the World Heritage Centre. The report also assures that no construction has taken place on the site of the former Franciscan monastery, and that all future projects that may affect the OUV of the property will be carried out in consultation with the World Heritage Committee, in conformity with Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines.
d) Conservation and preservation issues
Two international restoration and conservation projects are currently being carried out in cooperation with the Polish Ministry of Culture and the German technical cooperation (GTZ). In addition, programmes for the provision of financial aid to historical building apartment owners were introduced in 2010 when 37 house balconies were repaired and restoration work on the Armenian cathedral and Jesuit church was completed. All projects were carried out in accordance with established procedures, and conducted under the supervision of restoration professionals.
Analysis and Conclusion by World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies in 2011
The World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies note progress in the creation of the Strategic Management Plan and expect its completion and submission to the World Heritage Centre as soon as possible. They welcome the submission of the Master Plan of L’viv that is currently under review by ICOMOS.
The World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies take note of the report’s intimation that the urban structure of the property has not been changed, and that no construction works have begun on the property. In particular, they note that construction activities within the property and its buffer zone that may affect the OUV of the property have been halted.
The World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies recognise the State Party’s efforts to initiate conservation and rehabilitation projects with the international community, and encourage the State Party to continue with these in order to safeguard the World Heritage property. They acknowledge the efforts being made to protect the OUV through freezing development projects and by the definition of appropriate restoration and conservation work procedures. Nevertheless, they consider that more substantial progress is needed in addressing the recommendations of the March 2010 mission in order to remove the threats to the property which were acknowledged by the World Heritage Committee at its last session and led the World Heritage Committee to envisage the possible inscription of the property on the List of World Heritage in Danger.
Summary of the interventions
Decisions adopted by the Committee in 2011
35 COM 7B.113
L’viv – the Ensemble of the Historic Centre (Ukraine) (C 865)
The World Heritage Committee,
1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B,
2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.104, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010),
3. Notes the progress made with the development of a Strategic Management Plan and requests that it be sent to the World Heritage Centre immediately upon completion;
4. Acknowledges that major development projects which could adversely affect the Outstanding Universal Value of the property, and specifically the construction of a hotel and construction on the former Franciscan monastery site within the historic centre and buffer zone, have come to a complete halt;
5. Also acknowledges the progress of restoration works in accordance with established procedures, and reiterates that all future plans for restoration and new development must be submitted to the World Heritage Centre in conformity with Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines;
6. Recognises the value of restoration projects implemented in coordination with the international community, and encourages the State Party to continue in such efforts;
7. Urges the State Party to fully address the recommendations of the 2010 World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS reactive monitoring mission in order to achieve substantial progress towards removing the threats to the property;
8. Also requests the State Party to invite a joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS reactive monitoring mission to assess progress in the implementation of all necessary measures in compliance with its decisions, prior to the 37th session of the World Heritage Committee in 2013;
9. Further requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2012 (prior to the mission) and by 1 February 2013, progress reports on the state of conservation of the property and on the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 37th session in 2013.
Draft Decision: 35 COM 7B.113
The World Heritage Committee,
1. Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B,
2. Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.104, adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010),
3. Notes the progress made with the development of a Strategic Management Plan and requests that it be sent to the World Heritage Centre immediately upon completion;
4. Acknowledges that major development projects which could adversely affect the Outstanding Universal Value of the property, and specifically the construction of a hotel and construction on the former Franciscan monastery site within the historic centre and buffer zone, have come to a complete halt;
5. Also acknowledges the progress of restoration works in accordance with established procedures, and reiterates that all future plans for restoration and new development must be submitted to the World Heritage Centre in conformity with Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines;
6. Recognises the value of restoration projects implemented in coordination with the international community, and encourages the State Party to continue in such efforts;
7. Urges the State Party to fully address the recommendations of the 2010 World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS reactive monitoring mission in order to achieve substantial progress towards removing the threats to the property;
8. Also requests the State Party to invite a joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS reactive monitoring mission to assess progress in the implementation of all necessary measures in compliance with its decisions, prior to its 37th session in 2013;
9. Further requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2012 (prior to the mission) and by 1 February 2013, progress reports on the state of conservation of the property and on the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 37th session in 2013.
Exports
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.